Home » Publications By Author »
Publications of Boyd, David R.
2007
Boyd, D., 2007. “Old Ideas Produce Heat, Not Light.” Vancouver Sun, January 11, 2007.
Read Article
View Publication Details
Boyd, D. “Forty Questions about Canada’s Environmental Record.” Island Tides, January 25, 2007.
Read Article
View Publication Details
Boyd, D., 2007. “Reality Check: Climate Change and the Proposed Clean Air Act.” Presentation to the Standing Committee on Bill C-30. February 6, 2007.
Read Article
View Publication Details
2006
Boyd, D., 2006. The Water We Drink: An International Comparison of Drinking Water Standards. Vancouver: David Suzuki Foundation.
View Publication Details
Boyd, D., 2006. Radon: An Unfamiliar Killer. Vancouver: David Suzuki Foundation.
Read Article
View Publication Details
Boyd, D., 2006. The Air We Breathe: An International Comparison of Air Quality Standards and Guidelines. Vancouver: David Suzuki Foundation.
Read Article
View Publication Details
Boyd, D., 2006. The Food We Eat: An International Comparison of Pesticide Regulations. Vancouver: David Suzuki Foundation.
Read Article
View Publication Details
Boyd, D., and S. Wallace, 2006. Fireproof Whales and Contaminated Mother’s Milk: The Inadequacy of Canada’s Proposed PBDE Regulations. Vancouver: David Suzuki Foundation.
Read Article
View Publication Details
2002
Boyd, D., 2002. Wild by Law: A Report Card on Laws Governing Canada's Parks and Protected Areas, and a Blueprint for Making these Laws more Effective. Victoria: POLIS Project on Ecological Governance.
Read AbstractCanadians are deeply passionate about our parks and the diversity of life that these spectacular landscapes protect. Parks are seen as an integral component of our national identity. Former Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau referred to Canada's parks as "the greatest environmental treasures of the world."1 It is deeply disturbing to discover that the laws intended to protect these priceless treasures for present and future generations of Canadians are, for the most part, grossly inadequate for such an important task. This report reveals that only the federal government's Canada National Parks Act and National Marine Conservation Areas Act, Nova Scotia's Wilderness Areas Protection Act, and Newfoundland's Wilderness and Ecological Reserves Act achieve passing grades. Every other province and territory gets a failing grade. Alberta and Ontario deserve special mention for earning F- (F minus), the worst grade possible. The grades in this report are based on an evaluation of ten legal criteria, including: making the protection of ecological integrity the top priority; prohibiting industrial resource use; ensuring permanent protection through legislated boundaries; dedicating parks to future generations; requiring park planning processes that include the public; reporting on the state of parks; recognizing Aboriginal rights; guaranteeing a minimum of 12% of every ecosystem is protected; providing extra protection for wilderness areas and ecological reserves; and establishing a role in land-use decisions outside parks that have the potential to harm the parks.
View Publication Details
